Man has always treated sin as a misfortune, not a crime; as disease, not guilt; as a case for the physician, not for the judge. Herein lies the essential faultiness of all mere human religions or theologies. They fail to acknowledge the judicial aspect of the question, as that on which the real answer must hinge; and to recognize the guilt or criminality of the evildoer as that which must first be dealt with before any real answer, or approximation to an answer, can be given. elr It seems strange, after all, that man should be…easily misled, and that, among thousands who profess to seek for truth, so few should reach it. But man’s bias is on the side of error, just as it is on the side of sin; for all error is sin. Darkness is loved rather than light, and the bondage of the evil one preferred to the liberty of God. Hence, it is so easy to seduce men from the path of truth. God and truth are so closely linked together that they cannot have the latter without the former. A false religion without God they may have, but a true religion without Him they cannot have. And thus, they who have no relish for Divine companionship here and an eternity in the presence of God hereafter will be certain to turn away from a religion whose essence is communion with God; nay, will only the more deeply hate it because it is heavenly and Divine. There is nothing almost of which man is so tenacious, 51 as his right of thinking for himself (as he calls it) in matters of religion. In so far as this means merely that his fellow men have no right to think for him or to prescribe a religion for him, he is right. But in so far as he is claiming for himself a right of forming opinions independent of God, he is wrong—awfully wrong. Man has no right to think for himself apart from God or independent of the revelation of God. God’s declarations are to be received in unquestioning simplicity. What we are to believe, what we are to do, how we are to worship are not matters of opinion or speculation: they are truths—truths not reasoned out or demonstrated by man, but dictated by God and coming to us, therefore, with a certainty which man cannot add to or improve, and which no strength of mathematical demonstration can surpass. This thinking for one’s self independently of God and His revelation is not merely an evil, but a sin. Nay, it is a sin of more than common darkness—it is so audacious,52 so contemptuous towards God. It places man on a level with God or at least sets Divine truth and human opinion on the same footing. It strips the former of all innate authority, while it gives to the latter an authority to which it has no claim!…There can be no authority save that which is infallible and Divine, that is, God speaking to us directly in His Word.
Popular posts from this blog
Hosea 4:6. My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge
In a short time there will (we have reason to fear) remain but two kinds of persons among us, either those who think not at all, or those whose imaginations are active indeed, but continually evil. Of these latter it may be said, "Their foolish heart was darkened." Of the principles, I do not say of the detail, of political science, a sound theology is the only sure and steady basis. Now we trace the operations by which a destruction so extended in its consequences has been effected. The master-spring of every principle which can permanently secure the stability of a people is the fear and knowledge of Almighty God. The first operation of a principle of atheism, and perhaps one of the most formidable in its consequences, is that which leads political men to conceive of Christianity as a mere auxiliary to the State. Religion was not instituted (in the Divine council I mean) for the purpose of society and government, but society and government for the purposes of religion. As a...
God of my Fathers
Science is doing grand things today. Her beneficent step is heard almost everywhere. But physical science is comparatively young. And you know the characteristic defects of youth. It is headstrong and impatient, and often irreverent.It is sometimes not over reticent, even on matters concerning which it cannot form reliable judgments I now speak on "the claims of the religion of our fathers." 1. It was "our fathers'." That the sires trusted in God is a very sufficient reason why the sons should hesitate, and hesitate long, before they reach the grave conclusion that there is no God, or that if there be He cannot be trusted because He cannot be known. One of the healthiest facts of human nature and of human life has ever been that spirit of reverence for the past which links generation to generation, and practically makes the race one. We Englishmen are by no means destitute of this fine sentiment. 2. Our fathers proved it. What is the testimony borne by honest ...
Comments
Post a Comment